this is a 2 part discussion post. I only need about 200 words for each one. part
this is a 2 part discussion post. I only need about 200 words for each one. part 1. Now that we have explored some of the descriptive statistics and important basic data values in quantitative research and begun an exploration of inferential statistics, let's make sure we can sort these concepts out before moving forward. We have units of analysis about which we collect our data. The data we collect are categorized. Data with categories that can be different from one person to the next or in one set of circumstances to the next are variables. The categories that can be selected for each variable determine the scale of measurement of the data. The scale of measurement determines what measure of central tendency or average you can use, as well as the type of variability measurements that are valid. Those values are relevant both in the display of the descriptive statistics, as those measurements let you know what is normal or typical, and because they are part of many of the formulas in inferential statistical analysis. Perhaps the two most important inferential statistics measurements are hypothesis tests and correlation strength tests. Most of the time, the formulas for the two tests are one and the same. Sometimes, you need different tests for different purposes. 1) How does the hypothesis test analysis differ from the correlation strength analysis? What do each of these tests tell you about the data you have? Is either of the tests more important than the other? Should you do one type of test first? 2) Some students get bummed out because they find that their p-value is greater than 0.05. What does this mean? Do you believe this would be a valid reason to be unhappy about the data that you have collected? Why or why not? 3) What is the difference between data and information? What sets data and information apart from "knowledge" as we have discussed previously? part 2. The final part of this class considers mixing research methods, evaluative research, participatory action research, and meta-analysis. These are approaches to data collection and knowledge generation that cannot neatly fit into the two main branches of research that are quantitative and qualitative approaches. 1) Mixed methods are becoming increasingly popular. What are the pros and cons of mixed methods research? 2) Participatory action research (PAR) essentially makes the research subjects part of the research team, and gets them involved in any decision making processes (that often come from evaluative research). What are the biggest benefits of a PAR approach? What major pitfalls might come from participant involvement? 3) Do you prefer quantitative or qualitative research, in general? Do you feel you have an inclination toward one field of study or another based on this? Do you think one approach or another would be more useful to you in your chosen professional career? Why or why not?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.